Posted by Unknown
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
0 comments
Britain and elsewhere have long tweaked established social
institutions. But their iconoclasm goes further than this. Young Britons
are classical liberals: as well as prizing social freedom, they believe
in low taxes, limited welfare and personal responsibility. In America
they would be called libertarians.
More than two-thirds of people
born before 1939 consider the welfare state "one of Britain's proudest
achievements". Less than one-third of those born after 1979 say the
same. According to the BSA, members of Generation Y are not just half as
likely as older people to consider it the state's responsibility to
cover the costs of residential care in old age. They are also more
likely to take such a hard-hearted view than were members of the
famously jaded Generation X (born between 1966 and 1979) at the same
stage of life.
"Every successive generation is less collectivist than
the last," says Ben Page of Ipsos MORI, a pollster. All age groups are
becoming more socially and economically liberal. But the young are ahead
of the general trend. They have a more sceptical view of state
transfers, even allowing for the general shift in attitudes (see first
chart).
Polling by YouGov shows that those aged 18 to 24 are also
more likely than older people to consider social problems the
responsibility of individuals rather than government. They are deficit
hawks (see second chart). They care about the environment, but are also
keen on commerce: more supportive of the privatisation of utilities,
more likely to reject government attempts to ban branding on cigarette
packets and more likely to agree that Tesco, Britain's supermarket
giant, "has only become so large by offering customers what they want".
Why
the shift? History is one explanation. Today's young people grew up in a
period of relatively low unemployment, after the removal of the
contributory elements of the welfare system and long after the
collectivist afterglow of the second world war had faded.
But their
attitudes also reflect the hardships they face today. The economic
slowdown and government cuts have hit them harder than most. The
coalition has trimmed the support paid to those who stay in school
between the ages of 16 and 18, raised university tuition fees and axed a
temporary employment scheme for those aged 18 to 24. Although overall
joblessness is lower than in most European countries, youth unemployment
has increased by half since 2008: an advertisement of eight vacancies
at a Nottingham coffee shop recently drew 1,700 applications.
Just as
the construction of the post-war welfare state helps to explain the
collectivist instincts of the old, today's economic adversity and
dwindling welfare payments appear to be forging a generation of dogged
individualists. Rosina St James, a 22-year-old student who chairs the
British Youth Council, a network of 230 organisations, describes a sense
that "you're running against the person next to you". "People in our
generation are incredibly competitive with each other," she says.
Young
Britons' broad liberalism, their suspicion of state interventions of
most varieties, not only contrasts with the views of their elders. It
also makes them unusual internationally. Britons between 15 and 35 are
more relaxed about the consumption of alcohol, tobacco and cannabis than
are young people in the EU as a whole. Another Eurobarometer study
conducted in 2011 showed that Britons in that age group were more likely
to have set up their own business than their counterparts in any other
large European country.
In the United States (where, admittedly, the
state is smaller) polling in 2012 by the Pew Research Center shows that
59% of Americans aged 18 to 29 thought that "government should do more
to solve problems". That was higher than for any other age group. The
firm's polls also show that members of the youngest age group, though
liberal on gay marriage, are less likely to say that abortion should be
legal than any group apart from the over-65s. (Abortion is not always a
libertarian cause: Ron Paul, the country's most famous libertarian, is
fiercely against it.)
Young Britons' beliefs probably owe much to the
country's education system. Britain has high levels of university
attendance, a factor that correlates with social liberalism, says James
Tilley, an academic specialising in public opinion. It is a
materialistic society with a flexible labour market; its citizens chart
their lives on social media with more zeal than most-all things that
tend to contribute to a competitive, individualist mindset.
As yet,
there is little sign any of this is permeating mainstream politics. The
two main parties, the Conservatives and Labour, broadly adhere to the
conventional right-left divide (with economic liberalism on one side and
social liberalism on the other). Most young people reject politics
altogether: a 2013 study of political engagement by the Hansard Society
found that although some two-thirds of adults under 35 declare
themselves interested in "current affairs", only one-third confessed an
interest in "politics". Research by Ipsos MORI suggests that turnout
among young people at the 2010 election was just 44%, far below the
national average of 65%.
Ayn't seen nothing yet
But among the
politically engaged minority, libertarianism is growing. In April your
correspondent squeezed into a fuggy crowd of enthusiasts trading quotes
by Ayn Rand and Murray Rothbard in a room above a central London pub.
Between discourses on the merits of Bitcoin ("a currency without
government-perfect!") old-timers marvelled at the surge of interest.
Freedom Forum, an annual convention for young libertarians, has tripled
in size since its launch in 2011; a similar venture planned for July-a
"Freedom Week" of debate and lectures-has ten applicants for every
place.
Mark Littlewood of the Institute of Economic Affairs, a
think-tank, declares himself "gobsmacked" at the new popularity of
anti-statist ideas and confidently predicts the emergence of a mass
libertarian movement.
0 komentar:
Post a Comment